<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dalvik: how Google routed around Sun&#8217;s IP-based licensing restrictions on Java ME</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/</link>
	<description>Typesetting some of Stefano Mazzocchi's random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:32:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google&#8217;s Android good news for Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google&#8217;s Android good news for Microsoft?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 09:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/2007/11/12/dalvik-how-google-routed-around-suns-ip-based-licensing-restrictions-on-java-me/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>[...] basic point is that &#8220;Android as it is currently defined is a fork of the Java ME platform,&#8221; and &#8220;nor is it compliant with Java SE&#8221;. Although it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] basic point is that &#8220;Android as it is currently defined is a fork of the Java ME platform,&#8221; and &#8220;nor is it compliant with Java SE&#8221;. Although it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android &#124; Fred Brunel</title>
		<link>http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Android &#124; Fred Brunel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/2007/11/12/dalvik-how-google-routed-around-suns-ip-based-licensing-restrictions-on-java-me/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] How Google Routed Around Sun&#8217;s IP-based Licensing Restrictions on Java ME by Stefano Mazzocchi. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Google Routed Around Sun&#8217;s IP-based Licensing Restrictions on Java ME by Stefano Mazzocchi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google ready for enterprise Java? &#171; rand($thoughts);</title>
		<link>http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google ready for enterprise Java? &#171; rand($thoughts);</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 09:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/2007/11/12/dalvik-how-google-routed-around-suns-ip-based-licensing-restrictions-on-java-me/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] it comes to Java standards. This is true with the open source Android platform, where applications are written in Java but don&#8217;t compile to Java bytecode; causing consternations to the &#8220;write once, run anywhere&#8221; Java marketing proposition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it comes to Java standards. This is true with the open source Android platform, where applications are written in Java but don&#8217;t compile to Java bytecode; causing consternations to the &#8220;write once, run anywhere&#8221; Java marketing proposition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

